Friday, March 21, 2025

Ulaszewski, Bartosz, Marcelo Sandoval-Denis, Johannes Z. Groenewald, Marileide M. Costa, Bagdevi Mishra, Sebastian Ploch, Pedro W. Crous, and Marco Thines. "Genomic features and evolution of lifestyles support the recognition of distinct genera among fusarioid fungi." Mycological Progress 24, no. 1 (2025): 20.

 

What They Did

The researchers carried out a genetic comparison of fungus species in or closely related to the genus Fusarium in the family Nectriaceae. In addition to the 236 genomes already available, they sequenced another 40 from a variety of genera for a more representative sample of the family. A fungus in a related family was used as the outgroup, expected to be similar to the ancestral state of Nectriaceae.

By comparing 263 genes that were present in all the genomes, they determined which genomes were most similar and therefore more likely to represent closely related species. They found that the species within the Fusarium genus were in fact more genetically similar to each other than to members of other genera and that accepted taxonomic groups within the genus also largely matched the genetic relationships.

The fungi in the family Nectriaceae have a variety of survival strategies: many primarily live on or in plants; a handful are insect symbiotes; several are saprotrophs that digest decaying organic matter; and a few live primarily on other fungi or on animals. The researchers concluded that the common ancestor of all Fusarium species was likely a plant pathogen. Although some members of the genus do grow inside plants without causing disease, they may become harmful if the environment changes. The common ancestor of Fusarium and closely related genera was probably either a plant pathogen or a saprotroph, but since the earliest diverging groups are saprotrophs, the researchers believe that to be the more likely ancestral niche.

 

Further Exploration

The authors mentioned that the species Fusarium xyrophilum produces pseudoflowers on plants in the genus Xyris. It grows within the plant and causes sterility, then forms fruiting bodies that look like the flower petals (see https://www.ars.usda.gov/news-events/news/research-news/2020/fungus-commits-floral-fraud-to-fool-insects-into-spreading-it/.) Not only does it look like a flower to human eyes, but it also reflects ultraviolet light for insects and produces an attractant chemical. The insects that are normally pollinators of Xyris land on the fungus and carry spores to new hosts.

There’s also a Fusarium that’s an animal pathogen, aptly named F. veterinarium. I couldn’t find much information about it; apparently it was only described in 2018 (see https://wi.knaw.nl/details/89/567135.)  Several other Fusarium species, however, can cause animal diseases (see https://www.midogtest.com/blog/impacts-of-the-pathogenic-fungus-fusarium-in-animals/.) Of the animal pathogens on the linked site, F. oxysporum is closely related to F. veterinarium, so it’s not surprising that it can affect animals, even though it’s primarily a plant pathogen. Fusarium verticillioides, F. graminearium, and F. solani are also primarily plant pathogens, though F. solani is now in the genus Neocosmospora. Fusarium culmorum is primarily a saprotroph.

Fungi used to have different names for the sexual and asexual forms, which made sense because they can look different and even produce different types of spores. It’s not quite like the alternation of generations in plants, with a regular switch between sexual and asexual forms. Instead, the type of reproduction is determined by environmental conditions. There are a lot of details about how sexual reproduction works in fungi, but that’s a rabbit hole for another day!

Two petri dishes side by side. The one on the left says FM 2 and shows a reddish color with whitish material apparently growing over it. The one on the right is purple with many wavy lines of darker purple emanating from the center
Image credit: Tashkoskip

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Culture_soil_fungus_Fusarium_sp._with_purple_color.jpg


No comments:

Post a Comment

Please be nice.

Papini, Giulia, and Arnold Rakaj. "Microplastic retention in European flat oyster Ostrea edulis cultured in two Mediterranean basins." npj Emerging Contaminants 1, no. 1 (2025): 7.

New post - not going to try to keep to a schedule, but will post as I find the time and energy. What They Did The researchers compared t...