This is another post taken almost directly from my independent study schoolwork. Like yesterday's post, it assumes familiarity with the field, but I'm still very happy to take questions! Also like yesterday: Approaches to Transpersonal Epistemology © 2025 by Kimberly Israel is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
Heriot-Maitland et al., 2023: Transpersonal Experiences Questionnaire
Optimism about the future of transpersonal psychology is supported by an article in a mainstream psychology journal describing the development of an instrument for assessing the range of transpersonal experience in individuals. Heriot-Maitland et al. (2023) report a growing awareness of “psychotic-like experience” in the non-clinical population and a need to measure it on a continuum. Although the experiences in question may resemble psychotic symptoms, terms such as “anomalous experience” and “transpersonal experience” are used to de-stigmatize and de-pathologize them in a non-clinical context.
Heriot-Maitland
et al. developed their Transpersonal Experience Questionnaire beginning with an
unpublished set of 57 Likert-scale items from one of the authors and using
established methods to reduce it to 19 binary (yes or no) items. Unlike many
similar instruments, the questions refer only to the past seven days, allowing
for use with a single individual at different timepoints.
Factor analysis indicated that all items on
the questionnaire load to a single underlying factor, though responses to
several items correlated significantly with either age or level of education.
The population sample that participated in testing of the instrument was
disproportionately white, female, and young. Although the authors found no
correlations between responses and gender or ethnicity, further research would
be needed to validate the instrument for a more diverse population, and the
correlations with age and education need to be considered for any practical
application.
The
authors point out that the most “pathological” items on the questionnaire,
those relating to hallucinations or delusions, were not the most
discriminatory, suggesting that transpersonal experience is indeed different
from clinical psychosis.
Cunningham,
2023: Ontology of Spiritual Knowledge
Despite an
encouraging contribution to mainstream psychology, the transpersonal field also
continues to struggle with questions of epistemology. Cunningham (2023)
addresses the felt sense of reality that accompanies many exceptional human
experiences. Not only do the experiences feel real in the sense of seeming to
be actual relational encounters, but they may include a sense of
epistemological validity, of being “states of knowledge” that are
self-validating to the experiencer.
Cunningham
argues that "the very antiquity and universality of certain exceptional
human experiences adds to rather than detracts from the plausibility of their
possible ontological reality" (Cunningham, 2023). Although the ontological
reality of such experiences is unquestionable in the sense that people do have
them, their ubiquity alone does not mean that the experiences imply an
additional, unseen ontological reality. After all, the brightness contrast
visual illusion (an illusion in which colored regions that reflect the same
wavelengths of light are perceived as different colors based on the brightness
and contrast of the surrounding field) applies to urban Westerners and to rural
Africans (Kroupin et al., 2025), despite the different cultural influences.
More emotionally salient forms of non-ontological meaning-making may also apply
across cultures.
Cunningham
echoes Wilber (1990) in arguing that “spiritual knowledge claims are no more ‘private’
than mathematical knowledge claims” due to the fact that spiritual knowledge
can be taught and that people can learn methods to access it and compare
experiences. The degree of pluralism in spirituality, however, is quite
different from that in mathematics.
Creativity
leads to new insights and opens up “new realm[s] of human discourse”
(Cunningham, 2023) in both spirituality and mathematics, but the degree of
personal, subjective expression in spirituality might be more akin to that of
art than mathematics. Spirituality can be similar to mathematics, however, in
that it can permeate all aspects of an individual life and provide coherence,
much like mathematics can relate phenomena in the natural world through
underlying patterns that may not be immediately obvious.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gradient-optical-illusion.svg
References
Cunningham, P.F. (2023).
An empirically controlled metaphysics in a science of spirituality - is
something real happening? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical
Psychology, 43(2), 90-107.
Heriot-Maitland, C.,
Vitoratou, S., Peters, E., Hermans, K., Wykes, T., & Brett, C. (2023).
Detecting anomalous experiences in the community: the Transpersonal Experiences
Questionnaire (TEQ). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and
Practice, 96, 383-398.
Kroupin, I., Davis, H. E., Lopes, A. J. P., Konkle, T., & Muthukrishna, M. (2025, February 13). Visual illusions reveal wide range of cross-cultural differences in visual perception. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gxzcp_v2.
Wilber, K. (1990). Eye to eye: the quest for the new paradigm. Shambhala.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be nice.